Monday, January 16, 2012

Russian military says spacecraft debris falls in ocean (Reuters)

MOSCOW (Reuters) ? Pieces of a failed Russian Mars probe plummeted into the Pacific Ocean far off the Chilean coast Sunday, Russian news agencies cited a military official as saying.

Debris from the Phobos-Grunt craft fell into the sea some 1,250 km (775 miles) west of the coastal island of Wellington, state-run RIA and Itar-Tass cited Aerospace Defense Forces spokesman Colonel Alexei Zolotukhin as saying.

The spacecraft never made it out of Earth's orbit after its November launch on a rare interplanetary mission for Russia's struggling space program.

It was not immediately clear whether all the parts of the craft that did not burn up in the atmosphere had fallen in the same area.

RIA cited an unnamed source in a separate Russian military branch as saying ballistics experts calculated that debris could have fallen anywhere in a broad area centred on Brazil.

Russia's space agency Roskosmos had said debris from its doomed 14-ton craft, which included 11 tons of toxic rocket fuel, might fall in the Atlantic Ocean about midway between Brazil and West Africa.

Roskosmos and the military could not be reached for comment.

Due to constant changes in the upper atmosphere, which is strongly influenced by solar activity, the exact time and place of the probe's return had been unknown.

The $165-million spacecraft, designed to retrieve soil samples from the Martian moon Phobos, was meant to be Russia's first successful interplanetary mission in over two decades.

But it became stuck in orbit after a botched launch on November 9, and had since been slowly losing altitude due to gravity's pull.

SPACE JUNK

Experts said the falling space junk posed little risk, with the probe's aluminium fuel tank expected to burn up high in the atmosphere.

"If anyone gets to see it, it will be a fabulous show. I don't think there has been an explosion of such a large volume of fuel in space history," Igor Marinin, editor of a space journal published by Roskosmos, said earlier Sunday.

Some 20 to 30 small pieces of debris with a total weight of 200 kg (440 lb) could hit Earth, Roskosmos said, adding that a tiny radioactive cargo of Cobalt-57 was too small to cause harm.

One component likely to survive re-entry was a small return capsule specifically designed to crash-land back on Earth in 2014, mission scientist Alexander Zakharov said.

"This is the capsule that was meant to bring back samples from Phobos, it's disappointing," Zakharov said. "We're hoping Roskosmos will approve a new craft to accomplish this mission."

Phobos-Grunt was one of five botched launches last year that marred celebrations of the 50th anniversary of Yuri Gagarin's pioneering first human space flight and hurt Moscow's pride.

In an apparent attempt to deflect blame, Russia's space agency chief hinted last week that foreign sabotage might be the reason.

"I don't want to blame anyone, but there are very powerful means to interfere with spacecraft today whose use cannot be ruled out," Vladimir Popovkin told the daily Izvestia.

Stargazers watching for reentry included the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordinating Committee, an offshoot of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space.

Under a U.N. space convention, Russia could be liable to pay compensation for any harm caused by bits of falling spacecraft.

In 1981, the Soviet Union paid Canada $3 million for the cost of cleaning up radioactive debris scattered in the crash of a Soviet nuclear-powered reconnaissance satellite, Kosmos 954.

When NASA's defunct Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite fell out of orbit in September, it showered debris into the Pacific Ocean. Germany's Rosat X-ray telescope re-entered a month later over the Bay of Bengal.

(Additional reporting by Steve Gutterman; editing by Philippa Fletcher)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/europe/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120115/ts_nm/us_russia_spacecraft

melasma jimmy rollins jimmy rollins let it snow jason trawick jerry lewis tampa bay bucs

It's PlayStation 3 vs. Atari

Saints pass whenever, wherever, while the 49ers fight in the trenches ? which style wins?

Image: Brees celebratesReuters

Saints quarterback Drew Brees celebrates with Chase Daniel?after setting the single-season passing record with 5,087 yards.

By Gregg Rosenthal

NBCSports.com

updated 12:34 p.m. ET Jan. 13, 2012

Gregg Rosenthal

The 49ers and Saints will share a field Saturday afternoon in San Francisco, but they aren?t playing the same game.?

The Saints have evolved into the 21st century video game version of a football team. They are an extension of their quarterback. Drew Brees holds the controller, and the entire team is built around his skills.

Saints coach Sean Payton prizes continuity and smarts from his offensive players. He doesn?t just look for the best players; he looks for the best players that fit with Brees. Payton wants receivers that know exactly what Brees thinks when he sees certain coverages. Forget 40 times; the Saints value running backs that can catch, block, and line up in a variety of formations. Pierre Thomas isn?t the most skilled runner in the league, but he will never have to buy a beer again in New Orleans because he?s a great Brees sidekick.

New Orleans throws the ball in any game situation, any down and distance. They rank second in the NFL in pass attempts and 20th in rushing attempts despite mostly playing with the lead. They always attack, assuming that no lead or record is safe until the game ends. It?s a game that would be unrecognizable to Vince Lombardi.

Even the Saints defense is built around Brees. While New Orleans spends huge money on Brees? offensive linemen, the team saves under the cap with an opportunistic defense. New Orleans knows it?s impossible to build a complete team in the salary cap era, so they really don?t try. This is the old Colts model. The job of the Saints defense is to be aggressive and opportunistic to set up Brees.

The Saints will give up points, but their job is to make a few big plays. It?s like the Arena League. If the defense can just get a few stops, the offense should do the rest.

While the Saints are PlayStation 3, the 49ers are playing Atari.

The quarterback in San Francisco is almost incidental. Alex Smith is just a cog in the greater machine. 49ers coach Jim Harbaugh arrived from Stanford, took a look at his roster, and played to its strengths. San Francisco won 13 games and earned the NFC?s No. 2 seed by turning back the clock to the 1970?s.

San Francisco is built around defense first, and the running game second. Harbaugh views football as a disciplined war of attrition. He knows that his team will win most weeks if they avoid mistakes and dominate in the trenches. Simple.

The 49ers talk about balance on offense, but balance in 2011 means running the ball like crazy. They play it safe. Alex Smith threw for the fewest interceptions-per-pass of any quarterback in the league.

Harbaugh still shows off some modern flourishes within the framework of San Francisco?s smashmouth style. His formations and creativity with extra blockers in the running game looks more like a college running attack. He makes defenses prepare for a lot, and he will call a handful of ?shot plays? designed to give Smith simple reads for potential big gainers on offense. The defense is also difficult to prepare for because they are so talented and fundamentally sound.

In an era where coaches are often too stuck in their prescribed system, Harbaugh puts his players in positions to succeed. He could coach a more modern offense, but it wouldn?t suit his roster. Sean Payton could stop throwing so aggressively, but wouldn?t make sense for a team led by Drew Brees. Neither man is worried about convention, which is a good thing. Great coaching is above all adaptable.

The Saints are favored in San Francisco. This is largely because football fans are easily impressed with flashy numbers. The Saints look like a team built to win in 2012. Or 2022. If New Orleans does win, they might face Green Bay and New England next. Those are two more elite teams where quarterbacks rule all and defense is a rumor.?

The 49ers aren?t just trying to win a playoff game Saturday for a starved, once-proud franchise.

They are fighting to prove that their style of football can work in any era.

PLAYERS WITH MOST TO GAIN
1. Eli Manning, Giants:
They say you can?t improve pocket presence, but Manning has come a long way in his career at handling pressure. He?s great delivering passes with players in his face. A huge upset in Green Bay would help cement Manning as one of the game?s very best quarterbacks during a career year.

2. Justin Smith, Patrick Willis, and Frank Gore, 49ers: Smith and Gore are two of the most underrated players of the last decade. They are looking for their first playoff win. So is Willis. He is the very best at his position and is on his way to a Hall of Fame-type career, but too many people have barely seen him play.

3. Brian Cushing, Texans: Perhaps people will notice who the best inside linebacker on the field is Sunday in Baltimore. Cushing is the emotional leader of a still-overlooked Texans defense.

4. Robert Meachem and Marques Colston, Saints: The soon-to-be free agent wideouts for the Saints can make some money with a big playoff run.

5. Ryan Grant, Packers: He represents all the injured Packers from a year ago that only could watch their team win it all. Grant has possibly played his way into another year in Green Bay with a strong finish to the season.

6. Tim Tebow, Broncos: The guy needs more attention.

PLAYERS WITH MOST TO LOSE
1. Tom Brady, Patriots
: This game means so much to the Patriots. A third straight playoff defeat at home would be devastating for Brady. He seems more driven then ever at age 34, almost like he wants another title too much.? He knows the Patriots can?t be No. 1 seeds forever.

2. Ray Lewis, Ravens: He says this team is more complete than the 2000 Ravens. Terrell Suggs says this is easily the best Ravens team he?s played on. The Ravens are set up well to make another Super Bowl appearance, but this is a different role for them in the playoffs: Home favorites.

3. Joe Flacco, Ravens: If he thought the media didn?t give him credit before, try losing to a fifth-round rookie quarterback at home.

4. Charles Woodson, Packers: Woodson said it during the week. Two straight titles would put the Packers at a different level historically. This team seems very aware of how close it is to being an all-time great.

5. Sean Payton, Saints: It?s not particularly fair, but the Saints? winning streak has left many in New Orleans feeling that anything short of a Super Bowl title this year will be a massive disappointment.

MATCHUPS TO WATCH
1. Jason Pierre-Paul versus Chad Clifton
Green Bay did a decent job protecting Aaron Rodgers in the first matchup against the Giants with one huge exception. Jason Pierre-Paul absolutely manhandled left tackle Marshall Newhouse all day.

Now Chad Clifton is back after taking only 25 snaps in Week 17. He hasn?t played a full game since Week 4. It?s a tall task to ask Clifton to hold up against JPP on the outside. Packers right tackle Bryan Bulaga is also coming back from an injury and will be tested by New York?s pass rush.

2. Patriots tight ends versus Broncos safeties
Denver double-teamed Rob Gronkowski all day last time around, so Aaron Hernandez went off for nine catches and 129 yards. New England exposed the youth at safety and the lack of depth in Denver?s secondary last time. I doubt they found a solution in the meantime.

3. Texans offensive line versus Ravens front seven
Houston?s run blocking may be the best in football. Baltimore?s front seven led by Terrell Suggs and Haloti Ngata may be the toughest group in the league. The Texans didn?t get good push in Baltimore on the ground the first time these teams played. They need to win this matchup for a chance on Sunday.

4. San Francisco versus the blitz
The 49ers showed great difficulty identifying blitzing defenders in matchups against Dallas, Baltimore, and Arizona this year. They seemed to clean this up against the Steelers, but Saints defensive coordinator Gregg Williams will test Alex Smith. The 49ers don?t have many wideouts that can win one-on-one so expect to see a lot of pressure on Smith.

5. Von Miller and Elvis Dumervil versus the Patriots tackles
Patriots tackles Matt Light and Sebastian Vollmer have struggled with injuries at times this year. Guard Logan Mankins also isn?t 100%. The Patriots held up fairly well the first time around, largely by getting rid of the ball quickly.? If the Broncos pull off the upset Saturday night, it will be largely because Miller and Dumervil dominate.


advertisement

More news
It's PlayStation 3 vs. Atari

Rosenthal: The 49ers and Saints will share a field Saturday afternoon in San Francisco, but they aren?t playing the same game.

Source: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/45986386/ns/sports-nfl/

kelly clarkson playoffs empty nest supercross presidential debate braveheart nbc sports

Sunday, January 15, 2012

DNA Damage From Chemo May Help Spur Leukemia's Return (HealthDay)

THURSDAY, Jan. 12 (HealthDay News) -- The chemotherapy used to treat a form of adult leukemia sets a trap that can result in the return of the disease within years, a new study suggests.

The finding confirms the suspicions of specialists who thought chemotherapy drugs could disrupt DNA through mutations and ultimately allow tumor cells to avoid the effects of the medications.

"Chemotherapy drugs are absolutely necessary to get leukemia patients into remission, but we also pay a price in terms of DNA damage," study co-author Dr. Timothy Ley, a professor of oncology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, said in a university news release.

These drugs "may contribute to disease progression and relapse in many different cancers, which is why our long-term goal is to find targeted therapies based on the mutations specific to a patient's cancer, rather than use drugs that further damage DNA," Ley added.

The type of leukemia in question is known as acute myeloid leukemia. While chemotherapy treatment can send the cancer into remission, 80 percent of patients die within five years. In the United States, about 13,000 cases of acute myeloid leukemia are diagnosed annually, most often in people age 60 and older.

The researchers came to their conclusions after studying the genomes -- the entire DNA, both healthy and cancerous cells -- from eight patients with acute myeloid leukemia. They watched to see what happened after the patients received chemotherapy.

The investigators found that tumors essentially reappeared, according to the report published in the Jan. 11 advance online edition of Nature.

"It's the same tumor coming back but with a twist," co-author Richard Wilson, director of university's Genome Institute, explained in the news release. It "comes back with new mutations that give the cells new strategies for surviving attack by whatever drugs are thrown at them. This makes a lot of sense but it's been hard to prove without whole-genome sequencing."

Commenting on the report, Louis DeGennaro, executive vice president and chief mission officer of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, said the study "demonstrates the critical need to identify disease-causing mutations in acute myeloid leukemia so that therapies targeted specifically at these mutations can be developed."

Ultimately, he added, "that would allow us to avoid the use of chemotherapy, which may contribute to cancer relapse."

For now, DeGennaro said, "while current chemotherapy regimens have liabilities, they represent the best treatment currently available and may result in complete remission, which would allow eligible patients to receive a stem cell transplant, the only treatment capable of curing acute myeloid leukemia."

More information

For more about acute myeloid leukemia, visit the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/diseases/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20120113/hl_hsn/dnadamagefromchemomayhelpspurleukemiasreturn

texas longhorns texas longhorns bill maher francesca woodman kennedy center honors neil diamond howard hughes

Saturday, January 14, 2012

U.S. wins Japan support over Iran nuclear program (Reuters)

TEHRAN (Reuters) ? The United States won key support from Japan Thursday for tough oil sanctions against Iran over a nuclear program that the West suspects is geared to developing atomic bombs.

Japan pledged to take concrete action to cut Iranian oil imports after visiting U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner urged Tokyo, a major importer, to help deprive Iran of vital oil revenues. In Iran, sanctions are biting, with the rial currency losing 20 percent of value against the dollar in the past week.

Escalating tensions over Iran's enrichment of uranium for nuclear energy, which has shifted to an underground mountain bunker better protected from possible air strikes, has raised fears for the flow of world oil supplies and even war.

An Iranian nuclear scientist was blown up in his car by a motorbike hitman Wednesday. Tehran blamed Israeli and U.S. agents but insisted this would not derail its nuclear activity. Washington denied involvement in the attack and condemned it, while Israel declined comment.

The morning rush-hour bombing - the fifth daylight attack on technical experts in two years - killed 32-year-old Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan. The chemical engineer's driver was also killed, Iranian media said, and a passer-by was slightly hurt.

The attack came in a week of heightened tensions.

Iran has launched an underground enrichment plant and sentenced an American to death for spying, while Washington and Europe have stepped up efforts to cripple Iran's oil exports for its refusal to halt work the West says betrays an ambition to build nuclear weapons. Iran says its aims are entirely peaceful.

Tehran has threatened to choke the West's supply of Gulf oil if its exports are hit by sanctions, drawing a U.S. warning that its navy is ready to open fire to prevent any blockade of the strategic Strait of Hormuz, through which 35 percent of the world's seaborne traded oil passes.

In Tokyo, Geithner welcomed Japanese cooperation in tightening the screws on Iran, a positive sign for Washington after China and Russia rebuffed sanctions on Iranian oil exports.

China, Japan and India are Iran's top three buyers, taking more than 40 percent of its crude exports. The European Union, which collectively buys another fifth or so of Iran's exported crude, has committed to banning imports of oil from Tehran, an OPEC member and the world's No. 5 crude exporter.

EU diplomats said Wednesday they were advancing toward agreement on banning imports of crude after a six-month grace period and banning petrochemical products after three - provisions similar to U.S. new legislation. It was likely, however, that EU firms could continue to take Iranian oil in payment for outstanding debts.

Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda said he shared serious concerns about Iran's nuclear capabilities but expressed concern that the sanctions could seriously affect the Japanese and world economies, depending on how they were implemented.

President Barack Obama's administration has also announced that it would freeze out financial institutions that deal with Iran's central bank out of U.S. markets.

"We are exploring ways to cut Iran's central bank off from the global financial system. We are in the early stages of consulting with Japan and our other allies," Geithner told reporters after the talks with Japanese leaders.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

IRAN DEFIANCE

On a visit to Cuba Wednesday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said nothing about the bomb attack but flashed the victory sign and said Iran had done nothing to warrant enmity from its enemies.

"Have we assaulted someone? Have we wanted more than we should have? Never, never. We have only asked to speak about and establish justice," said Ahmadinejad.

Analysts saw the latest assassination, which would have involved considerable expertise, as less a reaction to recent events than part of a longer-running, covert effort to thwart Iran's nuclear development program that has also included suspected computer viruses and mystery explosions.

While fears of war have forced up oil prices, the region has seen periods of saber-rattling and limited bloodshed before without reaching all-out conflict. But a willingness in Israel, which sees an Iranian atom bomb as a threat to its existence, to attack Iranian nuclear sites, with or without U.S. backing, has heightened the sense that a crisis is coming.

Israel, whose military chief said Tuesday that Iran could expect to suffer more mysterious mishaps, declined comment on Wednesday's bomb attack.

While Israeli or Western involvement seemed plausible to independent analysts, a role for local Iranian factions or other regional interests engaged in a deadly shadow war of bluff and sabotage could not be ruled out.

The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, which has failed to persuade the West that its quest for nuclear power has no hidden military goal, said the killing of Ahmadi-Roshan would not deter it. "We will continue our path without any doubt ... Our path is irreversible," it said in a statement carried on television.

"The heinous acts of America and the criminal Zionist regime will not disrupt our glorious path ... The more you kill us, the more our nation will awake."

Iran's leaders, preparing for the first national election since a disputed presidential vote in 2009 brought street protests against 32 years of clerical rule, are struggling to contain internal tensions. Defiance of Israel and Western powers plays well with many who will vote in March.

U.S. DENIAL

In Washington, White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said: "The United States had absolutely nothing to do with this (bombing) ... We strongly condemn all acts of violence, including acts of violence like what is being reported today."

Israel, which has a history of covert killings abroad, declined comment, though army spokesman Yoav Mordechai wrote on Facebook: "I don't know who settled the score with the Iranian scientist, but I am definitely not shedding any tears."

Analysts say that killing scientists - especially those whose lack of personal protection suggests a relatively junior role - is unlikely to have much direct impact on Iran's nuclear program, which Western governments allege is seeking to enrich enough uranium highly enough to let it build weapons.

COVERT WAR

Sabotage - like mysterious reported explosions at military facilities or the Stuxnet computer virus widely suspected to have been deployed by Israel and the United States to disrupt nuclear facilities in 2010 - may have had more direct effects.

However, assassinations may be intended to discourage Iranians with nuclear expertise from working on the program.

Bruno Tertrais from France's Strategic Research Foundation said: "It certainly has a psychological effect on scientists working on the nuclear program."

Trita Parsi, a U.S.-based expert on Iran, said the killing might, along with the heightened rhetoric of recent weeks, be part of a pattern ahead of a possible resumption of negotiations on Iran's nuclear program; some parties may want to improve their bargaining position, others may see violence as a way of thwarting renewed negotiations altogether, Parsi said.

Last month, Iran signaled a willingness to return to a negotiating process which stalled a year ago, though Western officials say a new round of talks is far from certain yet given that Iran has said enrichment will not be up for negotiation.

Iran's decision to carry out enrichment work deep underground in the once undeclared plant at Fordow, near the holy Shi'ite city of Qom, could make it harder for U.S. or Israeli forces to carry out veiled threats to use force against Iranian nuclear facilities. The move to Fordow could reduce the time available for diplomacy to avert any attack.

The announcement Monday that enrichment - a necessary step to turn uranium into atom bomb fuel - had begun at Fordow has given added impetus to Western efforts to impose an oil export embargo intended to pressure Tehran to halt enrichment.

Iran, a signatory to the treaty banning the spread of nuclear weapons, says it is entitled to conduct peaceful research and denies any military nuclear aims. Its adversaries say its failure to take up their offers of help with civilian technology undermine the credibility of its position.

Oil prices have firmed 5 percent since Obama moved on New Year's Eve to block bank payments for oil to Iran.

(Additional reporting by Robin Pomeroy and Mitra Amiri in Tehran, Stanley White and Tetsushi Kajimoto in Tokyo and David Brunnstrom and Julien Toyer in Brussels; Writing by Ralph Gowling; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/japan/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120112/ts_nm/us_iran

costco kmart urban meyer ohio state traffic report traffic report opensky dia frampton

Anthony says she became pregnant after party (AP)

ORLANDO, Fla. ? Casey Anthony told a psychiatrist that she became pregnant with her daughter, Caylee, after passing out at a party when she was 18 years old, according to depositions in which the doctor said tests gave no indication that Anthony was mentally ill as she faced her murder trial.

The 25-year-old Anthony was acquitted last July of killing her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee, in a trial that captured the nation's attention. Anthony didn't know who fathered Caylee, the psychiatrist, Jeff Danziger, recounted in a deposition that was unsealed by a Florida judge and released Wednesday.

"Two beers, possibly given another drug. Woke up passed out," said Danziger, reading from notes he took during an interview with Anthony in November 2010. "Don't remember anything at a party, age 18. This is how she said she got pregnant."

Anthony is serving a year of probation at an undisclosed location in Florida on a check fraud charge.

Anthony showed no evidence of mental illness and had normal results on a psychological test, Danziger said in the deposition. He described that as surprising, given her circumstances in the Orange County Jail as a suspect in her daughter's slaying. Her temperament was calm, cooperative and pleasant, he said.

"You would expect that would provoke some measure of distress, whether someone genuinely did it, whether someone was falsely accused," Danziger said. "If my child was missing and I was in jail being accused of it, I probably wouldn't eat and wouldn't be cheerful and wouldn't be able to read."

Danziger said he was reluctant to recount all the information Anthony told him during his interviews with her, especially allegations that she had been sexually abused. He didn't want to become "a vector" of her allegations of crimes against individuals who may not have done anything wrong, he said.

During the trial, defense attorneys said Anthony's father molested her when she was young. George Anthony vehemently denied the allegation on the witness stand and defense attorneys provided no evidence to support it.

Caylee Anthony went missing in summer 2008, and her disappearance wasn't reported to authorities until a month later. Hundreds of volunteers searched for the missing girl. Anthony lied repeatedly to detectives, claiming a babysitter had kidnapped the toddler. At her murder trial, Anthony's defense attorneys claimed Caylee drowned accidentally.

Transcripts of the depositions had been sealed. But the Orlando Sentinel asked the court to make them public and Judge Belvin Perry agreed.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120111/ap_on_re_us/us_casey_anthony

bachmann bachmann dan savage iowa caucus results sickle cell trait michigan football michigan football

Friday, January 13, 2012

PFT: Jackson regrets his last press conference

597chrisfarl_20010627_27894.jpgGetty Images

Our good friend Mike Silver of Yahoo! Sports has penned yet another intriguing and thought-provoking item.? This one focuses on the possible reasons for the termination of Raiders coach Hue Jackson.

Silver?s theory is that Jackson knew too much about how poorly late owner Al Davis used to treat his son, Mark Davis, and that Mark Davis wants to remove from the organization anyone with direct knowledge of those interactions.? ?To project an image of authority,? Silver writes, ?Mark Davis needs to surround himself with employees who didn?t see him routinely disparaged and condescended to by his legendary father.?

Silver believes that Mark Davis is the classic Chris Farley (pictured) character known simply as ?Tommy Boy,? and that Mark Davis couldn?t stomach ?the thought of presiding over a team with a brash, intelligent and charismatic coach who knew how dismissively his father used to treat him.?

It?s funny and it?s fresh and it?s clever, but it?s also quite possibly dead wrong.

Upon the passing of his father, Mark Davis promptly sought the counsel of John Madden and Ron Wolf for assistance in finding the right person to assume the reins of the football organization, and Mark Davis accepted their advice that Reggie McKenzie is the right man for the job.? Silver criticizes Mark Davis for not going through the motions of interviewing other candidates, praising 49ers owner Jed York for doing the same thing last year when a stream of second-tier possibilities rolled through the offices at a time when everyone knew Trent Baalke was getting the job.? But York was, in the opinion of many, simply was setting up a phony competition that Baalke would be able to win.? Mark Davis decided not to waste time and money by bringing in a bunch of guys with no shot at the job, something Al Davis routinely did when hiring a coach, if only to pick their brains regarding the things other teams do.

Moving forward, Silver thinks that Mark Davis will urge McKenzie to dump any members of the football operation who know about the way that Al Davis supposedly used to mistreat Mark Davis.? If that happens, then perhaps Silver?s theory is right.? If it doesn?t happen, then Silver?s hypothesis is wrong.

For now, Mark Davis deserves the benefit of the doubt.? Mark Davis acknowledged on Tuesday that he knows what he doesn?t know, a rare trait among NFL owners who think that knowing a lot about something other than football gives them the ability to figure out a game that is far more difficult than it looks on TV.? By all appearances, Mark Davis has handed the keys to McKenzie, and Mark Davis plans to get out of the way.

Likewise, the annual sense of urgency that often characterizes the latter years of an aging NFL owner?s life likely will evaporate now, with a longer-term view of the franchise replacing the continuous tweaking that Al Davis surely felt compelled to do in order to get one more Lombardi Trophy during his lifetime.

And maybe, in the end, Mark Davis is opting not to ?kneecap? (as Silver puts it) guys like Hue Jackson because they know too many embarrassing facts about Mark Davis.? Maybe Mark Davis opted to move on from Hue Jackson because Hue Jackson behaved too much like Al Davis ? and maybe Mark Davis believes the Raiders can be run without big egos, hot tempers, or dismissive comments.

Maybe Mark Davis really is Tommy Boy.? In the end, however, Tommy Boy figured out how to save the company.? If Mark Davis, like so many other owners smart enough to know the limitations of their abilities do, defers to the football experts, the company owned by Al Davis may not only survive, but once again thrive.

Source: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/11/hue-jackson-wishes-he-could-take-back-his-final-press-conference/related/

verizon galaxy nexus lawrence lessig lawrence lessig time magazine person of the year 2011 time magazine person of the year 2011 good morning america new orleans jazz fest

Thursday, January 12, 2012

'Bama defense shuts down Tigers in BCS title game (AP)

NEW ORLEANS ? Alabama delivered what everyone expected from the first play of the BCS title game, when a host of red jerseys stuffed LSU running back Michael Ford at the line of scrimmage: a rock `em, sock `em affair dominated by defense.

The Crimson Tide's was simply better.

Led by bruising linebacker Courtney Upshaw and the opportunistic C.J. Mosley, the second-ranked Crimson Tide shut down the Southeastern Conference's top scoring offense in a 21-0 victory Monday night that earned Alabama its second BCS championship in three years.

"I'll tell you what, our defense controlled the tempo of this game," Crimson Tide coach Nick Saban said. "It was just a great team win. Every guy here, every fan that we have."

It was the first shutout in the history of the BCS title game, and the first blanking of the Tigers since 2002, when Alabama beat them 31-0 in Baton Rouge.

That was back when Saban was roaming the Tigers' sideline. The defensive-minded coach was on the other side this time, drawing up a game plan for Alabama that downright flummoxed LSU coach Les Miles, quarterback Jordan Jefferson and everyone else in the Superdome wearing purple and yellow.

The Crimson Tide didn't allow the Tigers to convert a third down until the fourth quarter, and didn't allow a snap in its own territory until there was 7:30 left in the game.

Of course, Alabama linebacker Dont'a Hightower promptly sacked Jefferson to force a fumble that was recovered by his good buddy Nick Gentry. The way things were going for the Tigers, it was a fitting way for their best offensive series of the night to end.

Trent Richardson added a touchdown run moments later to seal the victory, the only touchdown scored by either team in two meetings this season.

"We knew they were going to come out and try to run the ball against us," Upshaw said. "It's great to get the win. We really didn't call many blitzes. We were just hoping to contain them."

Contain them? How about downright dominating them, from start to finish.

Upshaw made a pair of stellar tackles at the line of scrimmage to force 3-and-out on LSU's second possession, and Mosley and cornerback Dre Kirkpatrick did so again on its next possession.

Miles, stubbornly sticking with Jefferson at quarterback, tried all night to get to the edge against the Crimson Tide's brutish defense. But each time, an Alabama cornerback or safety would fly to the ball, throwing his body at the running back or receiver with total abandon.

"We just wanted to come out and make a statement to the world, to everybody and to each other and LSU, that we are the best defense," linebacker Nico Johnson said. "It was no fluke."

Even after halftime, when the Tigers generally get things going ? they outscored opponents 264-61 after the break coming into the game ? the Alabama defense was there to keep the momentum.

After LSU got its second first down of the night, Upshaw managed to wrestle Jefferson down for a sack, and two plays later LSU had to send punter Brad Wing out onto the field again.

"The game plan was to spread them out," Jefferson said. "I didn't imagine it this way. I definitely didn't see it this way, but situations like this happen. ... Some defenses will have your number and Alabama had our number."

Just about the only bleak moment for the Crimson Tide came later in the third quarter, when Mosley intercepted an errant shovel pass deep in LSU territory. He was returning the ball when he was tugged to the ground by Jefferson, his leg twisting at a gruesome angle.

The sophomore linebacker was eventually taken from the field by motorized cart.

Jefferson wound up 11 of 17 for 53 yards, while the LSU offense managed just 92 yards of total offense. Only 39 of that was on the ground, even below the 45.8 average that the Crimson Tide had allowed against Football Bowl Subdivision teams since to last year's Capital One Bowl.

"Toward the end, I could definitely tell they didn't want to play against us any longer," Tide defensive end Jesse Williams said. "It was sort of like the light at the end of the tunnel."

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/sports/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120110/ap_on_sp_co_ne/fbc_bcs_key

marcel the shell with shoes on ecu john wooden mirror mirror tanuki mirror mirror trailer bob knight