Wednesday, November 6, 2013

The Man in Black in Living Color

Hilburn and Cash
"Moments before going onstage at Folsom, Cash suddenly felt calm. ‘There was something in their eyes that made me realize everything was going to be ok,’ he said of the audience. ‘I felt I had something they needed.’ " Robert Hilburn, at Cash’s side, covered the concert for the Los Angeles Times.

Photo courtesy Jim Marshall Photography LLC








In the 10 years since Johnny Cash died, the Man in Black has arguably been more culturally present than he ever was while alive. Hollywood has something to do with this, of course, giving us the strenuous portrayal by Joaquin Phoenix in 2005’s Walk the Line, the big-screen version of the Cash legend. A year after that, there he was again, scoring a chart-topping country album, the Rick Rubin–produced American V: A Hundred Highways—and again four years after that, when the next installment of the Cash brand, American VI, debuted at No. 3 on the Billboard album chart. His face has been slapped on countless envelopes since the U.S. Postal Service dedicated a stamp to him in June. And Cash music just keeps coming: several discs worth of previously unreleased recordings, back-catalog albums reissued by the score, greatest hits collections and box sets now numbering into the dozens, one for every price point—if you’ve got the money, pick that 63-disc Columbia Records box.














Or perhaps you’re in the market for a Johnny Cash book? There was already a shelf full, a pair of autobiographies among them, before Cash passed in 2003. Since then, nearly 50 additional titles have been published, everything from biographies (at least seven) to memoirs (including ones from his son John Carter, his daughter Rosanne, and his longtime bass player Marshall Grant) to in-depth analyses of specific albums—to a Johnny Cash reader, a cookbook, and even a graphic novel. There are several Cash photo books available, too, probably the most beautiful being the just-released coffee-table volume called Life Unseen: Johnny Cash, An Illustrated Biography. And there are quite a few deep-thoughts tomes, as well, usually with names like Johnny Cash and Philosophy: The Burning Ring of Truth.










So when I heard that another Cash book was on the way, this one a doorstop biography by longtime Los Angeles Times music journalist Robert Hilburn, I must admit that my first weary thought was: “Do we really need another Johnny Cash book?”












Yes, we really do, as it turns out, because Johnny Cash: The Life is so very good. I won’t sign off on “definitive,” as the book’s back cover proclaims, for reasons I’ll explain in a bit. But Hilburn’s work is far and away the most insightful, entertaining, comprehensive, and well-told Cash biography to date.










By now even casual fans are familiar with the broad-brush version of Cash’s story: his older brother’s death when he was little, haunting him down the years; the country and rockabilly hits in the 1950s followed by more crossover hits in the ’60s and ’70s; the famed prison concerts and the TV series—but also the addiction to a variety of pills; the long, tumultuous, and loving professional collaboration with June Carter Cash; and finally, following a lengthy period of artistic and commercial irrelevancy, the late-in-life second act that allowed Cash to reconnect with a young audience and to resuscitate his near-dead reputation as a rebellious-yet-moral American artist.










All this is consistent with the story Hilburn tells. But Hilburn also helps us see the Man in Black in something nearer to living color. It is not a pretty picture. Cash could be petty and insecure, and he was sheltered and self-centered in ways that only wealthy celebrities get away with for long. Cash got away with it, mostly, for much of his adult life, which is not at all to suggest that he and those closest to him weren’t paying heavy prices for his behavior straight along.










Cash was a neglectful and frequently frightening father to his children, and to June’s. “We’d wake up and find the kitchen was on fire because he done something wrong while making breakfast,” Carlene Carter, a future country artist in her own right, tells Hilburn of life with her stepfather when she was a girl. “Or he’d show up without his key and take an axe to the front door.”














Cash was, if not a serial liar, then at least a chronic embellisher: Some version or other of “[Cash] wasn’t inclined to let the facts get in the way of a good story” becomes almost a mantra in the book. He treated his first wife cruelly; he had a not-so-secret affair with Billie Jean Horton, the widow of his dear friend Johnny Horton, and a longstanding not-secret-at-all affair with the woman who became his second wife, June Carter. His pill-popping nearly killed him on several occasions, and it persisted late into his life.










I could go on but won’t. Suffice it to say, for long stretches of Johnny Cash: The Life, the protagonist comes off like a real asshole. If he weren’t Johnny Cash, I’d hate him.










Of course, he is Johnny Cash, so I like him very much, flaws and all. Partly that’s because I come to the book, as I suspect most readers will, deeply invested in Cash’s music. It’s also because I know the story will end about as well as could be imagined—and Hilburn’s accounting of Johnny and June’s final frail days together is tremendously moving. At times he almost seems to be in the room with them, and perhaps he was: A key to Hilburn’s success here is that he knew the Cashes personally from 1968 on—he was the only music journalist to cover the recording of Live at Folsom Prison—and interviewed them many, many times, including talks that took place not long before their deaths. Hilburn’s decadeslong commitment to the Cash story is surely one reason why so many of Cash’s friends, associates, and family members—including Johnny and June’s only child, John Carter Cash—not only shared their memories with Hilburn for the project, but granted the author access to Cash’s and their own personal correspondence.










The letters to his wives and his children, and the annual letters he for years wrote to himself around Christmastime, are among the main reasons readers will root for Cash, even when he’s just been at his worst. “Yes, congratulations John Cash on your superstardom,” he chides himself in a 1972 note. “Big deal!” He cops to his faults and beats himself up for his failures. Again and again, the letters show a man trying very hard—imperfectly, and only intermittently—to be a better father, a better husband and Christian, a better man. “You stayed off pills but you’re still awfully carnal,” he tells himself in 1968. “You know what those little vices of yours are … You need to pray more. You hardly ever pray. Big deals ahead in 1969, possibly a network TV show, but the biggest thing you’ve got is your family and home. You’d better hang with God … ”


















Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books/2013/11/johnny_cash_the_life_a_new_biography_by_robert_hilburn_reviewed.html
Related Topics: nyc marathon   pauly d   Common App   iTunes   olinguito  

Bellator sets viewership record for Saturday night special


As most would have expected, the biggest and most hyped show in Bellator history drew the largest television audience ever to see the product.


Saturday's show from Long Beach, Calif., originally a pay-per-view, turned into a Spike TV special, did an average of 1.1 million viewers over the three hours of 45 minutes of programming.


The show broke the company's record of 938,000 viewers set on its debut on the network on Jan. 17, a show that featured two championship fights, Michael Chandler vs. Rick Hawn for the lightweight title, and Pat Curran vs. Patricio "Pitbull" Freire for the featherweight title.


This show did more than one better when it came to quality of the lineup. Chandler headlined against former champion Eddie Alvarez in a rematch of the most famous, and arguably the best fight in Bellator history. The rematch, a five-round war where Alvarez won a razor-thin split decision, saw the Philadelphia product capture the title and set up a third meeting. The show also had Curran lose his title to Daniel Straus, and an interim light heavyweight title fight with Emanuel Newton winning a decision over "King" Mo Lawal.


The 1.1 million viewers would have been the most-watched live MMA fight show on U.S. television since UFC's debut on Fox Sports 1 on Aug. 17.


The show was moved to a Spike special after weeks of television and print advertising had gone out for the event as a pay-per-view headlined by Tito Ortiz vs. Rampage Jackson. Bellator MMA and Spike changed plans just days before the event when Ortiz pulled out of the fight due to a fractured neck.

Because the show ran long, and those who attempted to watch the show via DVR may have missed much of the main event, Spike announced the complete Chandler vs. Alvarez main event would be replayed on Friday night at 8 p.m., serving as a lead-in to the usual 9 p.m. start weekly show. Cheick Kongo vs. Peter Graham in the finals of a heavyweight tournament, and Joe Warren vs. Travis Marx in the finals of the bantamweight tournament, headline the live show. The winners of both fights are in line for title shots.


The show peaked at 1.4 million viewers at 11:17 p.m., so the late time slot also prevented the maximum number of viewers to watch the main event, which started at about 12:10 a.m.


Spike finished second in the Male 18-49 demographic on cable Saturday night.


Source: http://www.mmafighting.com/2013/11/6/5070442/bellator-sets-viewership-record-for-saturday-night-special
Tags: MacBook Pro   Avril Lavigne   Presidents Cup Streaker   9/11   Sons Of Anarchy Season 6  

Apple drops to second place in J.D. Power tablet satisfaction


Apple CEO Tim Cook enjoys touting the high ratings of his company's products in areas like usage, customer loyalty, and customer satisfaction, but he may not be so thrilled about the latest rankings from J.D. Power. For the first time since the firm started measuring customer satisfaction for tablets, Apple has dropped out of the top spot.


In volume two of the 2013 U.S. Tablet Satisfaction Study, it was Samsung who took the crown with a score of 835, just edging out Apple's score of 833. Apple can console itself with the knowledge that it still handily beat the average satisfaction rating of 821. The iPad also topped Amazon's Kindle, which scored 826; Asus, which came in at the average of 821; and Acer, who was also in the study.


[ Also on InfoWorld: Bruised Apple: Buggy products and user censorship. | Also: How to get the most money for your old iPad. | For quick, smart takes on the news you'll be talking about, check out InfoWorld TechBrief  -- subscribe today. ]


But why the shake up at the top?


The answers come in the more detailed breakdown of the study: Apple scored top marks in overall satisfaction, performance, ease of use, physical design, and tablet features; Samsung, on the other hand, scored similarly high in overall satisfaction, but ranked no more than "better than most" in physical design and tablet features, and brought in "about average" ratings in both ease of use and performance.


So how did the Korea-based firm squeak into the top spot? Price, my friends -- price. Samsung nailed a "better than most" rating in the cost category, whereas Apple was relegated to "the rest." That single ding alone was apparently enough to drop Apple to second place.


I can't imagine Cook or the rest of Apple will be crying into their $100 bills about this -- Apple's products have always been about quality at a price, and the company knows that's not going to appeal to everybody. But it will be interesting to revisit the ratings next year and see how the expansion of the iPad line -- which now has two iPad minis, the iPad 2, and the new iPad Air -- affects Apple's rating.


Either way, Apple's chief executive is going to have to come up with a new favorite statistic for next quarter's financial results conference call.


Source: http://images.infoworld.com/d/mobile-technology/apple-drops-second-place-in-jd-power-tablet-satisfaction-230020?source=rss_mobile_technology
Category: jack o lantern   Time Change 2013   miranda kerr   Pain and Gain   syria  

5 Things to Remember about chef Charlie Trotter

In this Dec. 30, 2011 photo, renowned chef Charlie Trotter poses for a photo in the dining room of his restaurant in Chicago. Trotter died Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013, a year after closing his namesake Chicago restaurant that was credited with putting his city at the vanguard of the food world and training dozens of the nation's top chefs. He was 54. (AP Photo/Sun-Times Media, Rich Hein) MANDATORY CREDIT, MAG OUT







In this Dec. 30, 2011 photo, renowned chef Charlie Trotter poses for a photo in the dining room of his restaurant in Chicago. Trotter died Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013, a year after closing his namesake Chicago restaurant that was credited with putting his city at the vanguard of the food world and training dozens of the nation's top chefs. He was 54. (AP Photo/Sun-Times Media, Rich Hein) MANDATORY CREDIT, MAG OUT







(AP) — Five things to remember about acclaimed Chicago chef Charlie Trotter, who died Tuesday:

1. HE WASN'T ALWAYS INTERESTED IN FOOD AND DIDN'T GO TO CULINARY SCHOOL

Culinary arts didn't pique chef Charlie Trotter's interest until college, when his roommate would prepare different courses for friends. Trotter was self-taught. After he graduated from college, Trotter traveled the U.S. and Europe to dine at fine restaurants. His first job was as a cook at the Chicago-area restaurant Sinclair's, owned by famed chef Gordon Sinclair.

2. TROTTER WAS GROUNDBREAKING

He is credited as being one of the first chefs in the U.S. to prepare and serve all-vegetable tasting menus. He also was on the forefront of using organic food, naturally produced meats and seasonal philosophies of cooking.

3. HE CLOSED HIS RESTAURANT LAST YEAR TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL

Trotter closed his famed Chicago namesake restaurant Charlie Trotter's last August after 25 years. He said he was going back to college to enroll in a master's degree program in philosophy.

4. HIS KITCHEN WAS A TRAINING GROUND FOR THE FAMOUS

Dozens of the nation's top chefs, including Graham Elliott and Grant Achatz, worked under Trotter.

5. HE REALLY LOVED BEING A CHEF

Trotter talked to The Associated Press in August 2012 before he closed his restaurant saying, "I completely love what I do. I pinch myself every day going 'I make a living doing this. This is unbelievable.'" He also said, "The minute I started working in a restaurant formally as a cook or on the road to becoming a chef was like the greatest day of my life."

Associated PressSource: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2013-11-06-Obit-Trotter-5%20Things%20to%20Remember/id-cccff50b1d294849b0fa2d633a4e1790
Tags: aaron rodgers   amanda knox   bo pelini   Colin Kaepernick   Miley Cyrus Vma 2013  

Tilda Swinton honored at MoMA on 53rd birthday

Actress Tilda Swinton, left, and actor Ralph Fiennes, right, attend the the Museum of Modern Art Film Benefit on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Andy Kropa/Invision/AP)







Actress Tilda Swinton, left, and actor Ralph Fiennes, right, attend the the Museum of Modern Art Film Benefit on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Andy Kropa/Invision/AP)







Actress Tilda Swinton attends the the Museum of Modern Art Film Benefit on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Andy Kropa/Invision/AP)







Actress Jessica Biel attends the the Museum of Modern Art Film Benefit on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Andy Kropa/Invision/AP)







Fashion designer Karl Lagerfeld, left, and actress Tilda Swinton, right, attend the the Museum of Modern Art Film Benefit on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Andy Kropa/Invision/AP)







Actor Ralph Fiennes attends the the Museum of Modern Art Film Benefit on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Andy Kropa/Invision/AP)







(AP) — The last time Oscar-winning actress Tilda Swinton had a birthday party, she told a New York audience on Tuesday, she was nine years old.

"We had a trampoline," she said. "But who knew that 53 would top even that?" Tuesday was not only her 53rd birthday but the occasion of a glittery gala at the Museum of Modern Art, honoring her contribution to cinema.

Among those paying tribute to Swinton were David Bowie, Ralph Fiennes, designer Karl Lagerfeld, and Vogue editor Anna Wintour, all of whom co-chaired the event, and other luminaries like director Sofia Coppola, actress Jessica Biel, actress Lupita Nyong'o of "12 Years a Slave," and also New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg — just as Democrat Bill de Blasio was being elected to succeed him as mayor.

"I'm a film nerd," Swinton told the crowd, explaining her choice of career. "I continue to do it simply because I continue to believe that film is good for the soul."

The Scottish actress, who won a best supporting actress Oscar for "Michael Clayton" in 2007, is also known for her fashion sense, and she wore Chanel, which sponsored the evening — flowing white trousers and a light gray tweed jacket. Designer (and "Project Runway" host) Zac Posen, one of the guests, called Swinton's fashion style "Impeccable, risky and cutting edge. She's incorporated fashion as an art form, and as a design."

But it was director Wes Anderson, who directed Swinton in the upcoming film "The Grand Budapest Hotel" as well as the recent "Moonrise Kingdom," who, in absentia, best described Swinton's pale, ethereal look. The actress is "almost the color of a cloud," Anderson said in a statement read by Fiennes, who co-stars in the new Anderson film. "Yet everything pales beside her."

Swinton will also soon appear in "Snowpiercer," by director Bong Joon-ho, who regaled the crowd with a tale of Swinton demanding to look uglier in the film — with false teeth, a "piggy nose" and sagging breasts.

A montage of Swinton's work was shown, highlighted by clips from "Orlando," ''Burn After Reading," and of course "Michael Clayton," in which she played a ruthless lawyer willing to stop at nothing to protect her corrupt company's secrets.

Fiennes spoke of the "wisdom and humor" in Swinton's work, and told her: "I think you shine a sharp and uncompromising beam onto your work." Before the event, he noted that even though he only recently met Swinton, working on their current film, "I've admired her since I was a student. She's unique, and a great artist." He also said that despite her dramatic intensity, she's good at comedy, and has a great sense of humor.

Indeed, Swinton had the crowd in giggles when she explained that when she feels uncomfortable appearing in public, she recalls the words of a former nanny: "Nobody's going to be looking at you anyway, Matilda."

Previous honorees of the MoMA film benefit have been directors: Baz Luhrmann, Tim Burton, Kathryn Bigelow, Pedro Almodovar and Quentin Tarantino.

Associated PressSource: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2013-11-05-US-Film-Tilda-Swinton/id-51ff7b2448f546f5ab3d719e85e74eff
Similar Articles: Remember Remember The 5th Of November   breaking bad   Ray Rice   monday night football   Julie Harris  

Kerry seeks movement in Israeli, Palestinian talks

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, right, shakes hands with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013. (AP Photo/Jason Reed, Pool)







U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, right, shakes hands with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013. (AP Photo/Jason Reed, Pool)







U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, left, speaks with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, in the West Bank city of Bethlehem, Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013. .S. Secretary of State John Kerry waded again into the nitty-gritty of faltering Israeli-Palestinian peace talks on Wednesday, saying he was optimistic that tensions and difficulties could be overcome, even as Israel's leader bashed the Palestinians for the poor state of negotiations. (AP Photo/Fadi Arouri, Pool)







Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, right, speaks with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013. (AP Photo/Jason Reed, Pool)







Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, right, speaks with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013. (AP Photo/Jason Reed, Pool)







Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, right, speaks with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013. (AP Photo/Jason Reed, Pool)







BETHLEHEM, West Bank (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry waded again into the nitty-gritty of faltering Israeli-Palestinian peace talks on Wednesday, saying he was optimistic that tensions and difficulties could be overcome, even as both sides traded barbs about who is to blame for the current poor state of negotiations.

"As in any negotiation there will be moments of up and moments of down," Kerry told Palestinians in the West Bank town of Bethlehem after meeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem and before seeing Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. "But ... we are determined to try to bring lasting peace to this region."

"We are convinced that despite the difficulties, both leaders, President Abbas and Prime Minister Netanyahu, are also determined to work toward this goal," he said.

Yet tension between the two sides was running high and on clear display after the Palestinians said a secret negotiating session on Tuesday broke down in an acrimonious dispute over Israeli settlement construction. Introducing Kerry in Bethlehem, the town's mayor denounced Israeli settlements as a "siege" and Netanyahu opened his meeting with the secretary by bashing the Palestinians for their behavior in the peace talks.

"I'm concerned about their progress because I see the Palestinians continuing with incitement, continuing to create artificial crises, continuing to avoid, run away from the historic decisions that are needed to make a genuine peace," Netanyahu told Kerry as they started their two hour and 45-minute meeting in a Jerusalem hotel. "I hope that your visit will help steer them back to a place where we could achieve the historical peace that we seek and that our people deserve."

Despite Netanyahu's slap at the Palestinians, Kerry said he was optimistic that the difficulties could be overcome.

"I am very confident of our ability to work through them," Kerry said. "That is why I am here."

"This can be achieved with good faith and a serious effort on both sides," he said, calling on Netanyahu and Abbas to make "real compromises and hard decisions."

Kerry said he would continue to plug away despite the problems.

"We need the space to negotiate privately, secretly, quietly and we will continue to do that," he said. "We have six months ahead of us on the timetable we have set for ourselves and I am confident we have the ability to make progress."

After seeing Netanyahu, Kerry traveled to Bethlehem where he announced that the U.S. would give an additional $75 million in aid to create Palestinian jobs and help them improve roads, schools and other infrastructure. U.S. officials said the aid is designed to boost Palestinian public support for the peace process.

Once he finishes his talks with Abbas in Bethlehem, Kerry is to return to Jerusalem for a meeting with Israeli President Shimon Peres and have a working dinner with Netanyahu. On Thursday, Kerry plans to travel to Jordan, where he expects to see Abbas for a second time on his current mission.

After months of cajoling, Kerry persuaded Israel and the Palestinians to reopen peace talks in late July after a nearly five-year break.

But after being launched with great fanfare, the negotiations quickly ran into trouble with no visible signs of progress and both sides reverting to a familiar pattern of finger pointing. The goal of reaching a peace deal within nine months appears in jeopardy. Underscoring the challenge ahead, the Tuesday negotiating session broke down, according to a Palestinian official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the pledge not to discuss the talks in public.

The official said the outrage over the settlement plans boiled over at a secret negotiating session with the Israelis in Jerusalem. The official said the meeting, held at Kerry's request, "exploded" over the settlement issue, and that the talks were abruptly halted. Abbas is expected to raise the matter with Kerry at their meeting in Bethlehem.

Israeli and U.S. officials had no immediate comment.

The talks are set to end in April and the current deadlock has raised speculation that the U.S. may need to step up its involvement and present its own blueprint for peace early next year, or perhaps lower expectations and pursue a limited, interim agreement. Kerry and his aides have refused to discuss such an option, insisting instead that the goal of the talks remains a comprehensive peace pact.

The parties have largely honored Kerry's request to keep the content of the negotiations secret. But officials on both sides have acknowledged that no progress has been made, though they say that the talks have addressed all key issues at the core of the dispute. These include defining the borders of a future Palestine, and addressing Israeli security demands.

The Palestinians want to establish an independent state in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip, territories captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war. They say they're willing to adjust those borders to allow Israel to keep some West Bank settlements as part of a "land swap."

Netanyahu opposes a withdrawal to Israel's pre-1967 lines, saying such borders would be indefensible.

He has also demanded that the Palestinians recognize Israel as the Jewish homeland, a condition they reject on the grounds that it would harm the rights of Israel's Arab minority and Palestinian refugees who claim lost properties inside what is now Israel. Netanyahu also rejects shared control of east Jerusalem, home to key religious sites and the Palestinians' hoped-for capital.

For years, the Palestinians refused to sit down with Netanyahu while he continued to expand Jewish settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem. The Palestinians say continued expansion of the settlements, now home to more than 500,000 Israelis, is a sign of bad faith.

Under heavy U.S. pressure, the Palestinians reluctantly agreed to drop their demand for a settlement freeze in return for Israeli pledges to release about 100 long-serving Palestinian prisoners, and vague assurances that any settlement construction would be restrained.

The U.S.-brokered formula has been put to the test in recent days. Israel released a second batch of prisoners, all of whom had been convicted of murdering Israelis, setting off a painful debate over the merits of such a move. Joyful Palestinian celebrations welcoming the prisoners home as heroes added to the Israeli public's anger.

Netanyahu responded to the prisoner release by announcing plans to build thousands of homes in settlements, angering the Palestinians.

Associated PressSource: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2013-11-06-ML-Mideast-Kerry/id-71d29d6d2113405db3a544604386bce1
Category: world series game 4   denver broncos   Wrecking Ball   anthony weiner   aaron hernandez  

Conversations between lovers about STIs are important in theory but difficult in bed

Conversations between lovers about STIs are important in theory but difficult in bed


[ Back to EurekAlert! ]

PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:

6-Nov-2013



[


| E-mail

]


Share Share

Contact: Margo Mullinax
marbmull@indiana.edu
Indiana University






BOSTON -- Having sex can be fun; and talking about sex can be fun. Talking about sexually transmitted infections with a sexual interest, however, is a totally different matter, according to new research from Indiana University's Center for Sexual Health Promotion.


The study, to be discussed Nov. 6. during the American Public Health Association's annual meeting, found a disconnect between the public health messages that promote STI testing as a way to prevent STIs such as HIV and chlamydia and the conversations -- or lack of them -- occurring in bedrooms.


"Talking to partners about STIs is an important conversation to have," said Margo Mullinax, lead researcher for "Talk about testing: What sexual partners discuss in relation to STI status and why." "However, findings from this study suggest public health campaigns need to promote specific messages, concrete tips and tools around sexual health conversations stratified by relationship status. Campaigns should also address STI stigma and promote messages of normalcy with regard to talking about STIs."


STIs, if untreated, can lead to a range of health problems including infertility, so a growing public health emphasis has been on preventing STIs through testing. Mullinax said little was known, however, about how STI testing figured into actual conversations between lovers, particularly among the college-age crowd that accounts for a disproportionate number of new STI cases nationwide.


She recruited 181 sexually active men and women, average age 26, to take an anonymous online questionnaire that probed the issue, looking for insights into how conversations about STIs might influence behavior and decision-making.


She described the sample as highly educated, with many participants who commented on their own work in sexual health education. More than half were in monogamous relationships. Most of the participants were white and identified themselves as heterosexual or straight.


Mullinax said she was surprised to learn that about the same percentage of study participants engaged in sex without a condom regardless of whether they talked about STIs with their partners.


"Participants who reported talking to their partners about STIs say it affected their decision to engage in certain behaviors in that it made them feel more comfortable and led them to stop using condoms," she said. "But this finding concerns me given that many participants did not also report routinely getting tested nor having detailed conversations with partners about STIs."


Here are some of the other findings:


  • Many participants reported that they occasionally, rarely or never got tested before having sex with partners who were casual (50.3 percent) or long-term (38.7 percent).
  • Of the people who did discuss STI testing, very few discussed concurrent sexual partners or when partners' testing occurred in relation to their last sex act, and only half clarified what types of STIs their partner had been tested for. These issues are important components of assessing STI risk.
  • About a third of participants said they told a partner they didn't have an STI even though they hadn't been tested since their last sexual partner.

Mullinax said just a little more than half of study participants reported feeling "very comfortable" talking to partners about how to prevent STIs. Less than half felt "very comfortable" talking with a partner about sexual histories. Comfort levels improved -- and conversations became easier -- when people felt better informed about STIs and had practice talking about STIs with partners


"Take time to get informed," she said. "It will only make your conversation more comfortable and ensure that you are really protecting your health."

###


Mullinax will discuss her study at 1:15 p.m. Nov. 6. The co-author is Michael Reece, co-director of the Center for Sexual Health Promotion at IU Bloomington and associate dean of the IU School of Public Health-Bloomington.


Mullinax can be reached at marbmull@indiana.edu. For additional assistance, contact Tracy James at 812-855-0084 or traljame@iu.edu.




[ Back to EurekAlert! ]

[


| E-mail


Share Share

]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.




Conversations between lovers about STIs are important in theory but difficult in bed


[ Back to EurekAlert! ]

PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:

6-Nov-2013



[


| E-mail

]


Share Share

Contact: Margo Mullinax
marbmull@indiana.edu
Indiana University






BOSTON -- Having sex can be fun; and talking about sex can be fun. Talking about sexually transmitted infections with a sexual interest, however, is a totally different matter, according to new research from Indiana University's Center for Sexual Health Promotion.


The study, to be discussed Nov. 6. during the American Public Health Association's annual meeting, found a disconnect between the public health messages that promote STI testing as a way to prevent STIs such as HIV and chlamydia and the conversations -- or lack of them -- occurring in bedrooms.


"Talking to partners about STIs is an important conversation to have," said Margo Mullinax, lead researcher for "Talk about testing: What sexual partners discuss in relation to STI status and why." "However, findings from this study suggest public health campaigns need to promote specific messages, concrete tips and tools around sexual health conversations stratified by relationship status. Campaigns should also address STI stigma and promote messages of normalcy with regard to talking about STIs."


STIs, if untreated, can lead to a range of health problems including infertility, so a growing public health emphasis has been on preventing STIs through testing. Mullinax said little was known, however, about how STI testing figured into actual conversations between lovers, particularly among the college-age crowd that accounts for a disproportionate number of new STI cases nationwide.


She recruited 181 sexually active men and women, average age 26, to take an anonymous online questionnaire that probed the issue, looking for insights into how conversations about STIs might influence behavior and decision-making.


She described the sample as highly educated, with many participants who commented on their own work in sexual health education. More than half were in monogamous relationships. Most of the participants were white and identified themselves as heterosexual or straight.


Mullinax said she was surprised to learn that about the same percentage of study participants engaged in sex without a condom regardless of whether they talked about STIs with their partners.


"Participants who reported talking to their partners about STIs say it affected their decision to engage in certain behaviors in that it made them feel more comfortable and led them to stop using condoms," she said. "But this finding concerns me given that many participants did not also report routinely getting tested nor having detailed conversations with partners about STIs."


Here are some of the other findings:


  • Many participants reported that they occasionally, rarely or never got tested before having sex with partners who were casual (50.3 percent) or long-term (38.7 percent).
  • Of the people who did discuss STI testing, very few discussed concurrent sexual partners or when partners' testing occurred in relation to their last sex act, and only half clarified what types of STIs their partner had been tested for. These issues are important components of assessing STI risk.
  • About a third of participants said they told a partner they didn't have an STI even though they hadn't been tested since their last sexual partner.

Mullinax said just a little more than half of study participants reported feeling "very comfortable" talking to partners about how to prevent STIs. Less than half felt "very comfortable" talking with a partner about sexual histories. Comfort levels improved -- and conversations became easier -- when people felt better informed about STIs and had practice talking about STIs with partners


"Take time to get informed," she said. "It will only make your conversation more comfortable and ensure that you are really protecting your health."

###


Mullinax will discuss her study at 1:15 p.m. Nov. 6. The co-author is Michael Reece, co-director of the Center for Sexual Health Promotion at IU Bloomington and associate dean of the IU School of Public Health-Bloomington.


Mullinax can be reached at marbmull@indiana.edu. For additional assistance, contact Tracy James at 812-855-0084 or traljame@iu.edu.




[ Back to EurekAlert! ]

[


| E-mail


Share Share

]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.




Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-11/iu-cbl110113.php
Tags: danielle fishel   tom brady   EBT   Merritt Wever   grand theft auto 5